Judge Blocks Gun-Free Zone at Flint City Hall, Citing Violation of Open Meetings Act
A recent ruling by Genesee Circuit Judge Brian S. Pickell temporarily prevents the city of Flint from enforcing a gun-free zone at Flint City Hall. The decision comes after several gun-rights groups and three Flint residents filed a lawsuit, arguing that the gun ban violated the state’s Open Meetings Act by excluding members of the public from City Council meetings based on their possession of restricted items, including guns, which are allowed under state law.
In granting the preliminary injunction, Judge Pickell acknowledged that there are legal issues that still need to be resolved, such as the reasonableness and lawfulness of a gun ban and whether City Hall is considered a satellite district court. The city had implemented the gun-free zone based on a memorandum of understanding with the Genesee District Court, designating City Hall as a venue for court hearings and subject to court security orders.
Under the court’s orders, weapons including firearms, explosives, and certain tools are prohibited at City Hall, along with chemical pepper or mace sprays. However, the judge’s ruling partially grants and partially denies the motion filed against the city, returning Flint’s municipal center to its previous status until all remaining questions are resolved.
Mayor Sheldon Neeley’s administration had announced the gun-free zone designation in an effort to enhance safety at City Council meetings. Prior to the gun ban, a metal detector had been placed outside council chambers, but licensed and registered individuals were still allowed to attend meetings while carrying weapons. Mayor Neeley expressed disappointment with the judge’s ruling, stating that the city’s aim was to protect residents while engaging in government activities.
Gun rights activists argued that the city was infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens who carry firearms for personal protection. They highlighted flaws in Flint’s gun ban, including its reliance on court orders despite the absence of a district court presence in City Hall. Attorneys representing the individuals who filed the lawsuit contended that Mayor Neeley was using court security as an excuse to violate citizens’ rights.
The ruling has sparked debate regarding public safety and the balance between individual rights and protecting against potential threats. While some argue that banning guns at City Hall is necessary to ensure safety, others question the effectiveness of such measures and insist on upholding individuals’ right to bear arms.
As the lawsuit continues, Flint residents, officials, and gun rights advocates will closely monitor the court’s final decision on the gun-free zone. In the meantime, the city has expressed its commitment to fully adjudicate the lawsuit and maintain the safety of residents attending public meetings.
