Split Decision: Networks Mention But Downplay Bill Clinton in Epstein Document Dumps
Despite expectations, major broadcast networks have covered the release of previously-sealed documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. However, there has been mixed coverage when it comes to former President Bill Clinton’s ties to Epstein. ABC’s flagship newscasts failed to mention a disturbing claim by former Epstein associate Johanna Sjoberg that Epstein had stated, Clinton likes them young, referring to girls. ABC’s senior investigative correspondent, Aaron Katersky, downplayed the documents as containing previously known information. He mentioned new details about an old groping accusation against Prince Andrew and Clinton’s connection to Epstein.
On CBS, Nancy Chen briefly discussed Clinton’s involvement, including the claim about young girls. However, NBC’s Laura Jarrett only mentioned Clinton’s ties on Thursday and did not bring it up on Friday. Instead, she highlighted claims of Trump’s association with Epstein.
In terms of the content of the documents, they include arguments by Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre’s lawyers who sought testimony from Clinton, calling him a key person who can provide information about his close relationship with Maxwell and Epstein. Giuffre alleged having dinner with Clinton on Epstein’s private Caribbean island, while Maxwell denied the claim, stating that it was false. Clinton was never deposed. Other powerful men named in the documents, such as former Senator George Mitchell, former Ambassador Bill Richardson, and Hyatt hotel chairman Tom Pritzker, have also denied the allegations.
The documents also revealed an allegation that Clinton had threatened Vanity Fair to prevent the publication of articles critical of Epstein. While those involved have denied the claim, it adds to the complexity of Clinton’s connection to the disgraced financier.
Although there were varying degrees of coverage on the networks, it is clear that the mention of Bill Clinton in the Epstein documents has not received consistent attention. The networks have chosen to focus on other aspects of the case, such as Trump’s alleged involvement. As more documents are unsealed, it remains to be seen how the networks will prioritize their coverage and address the claims made against various influential individuals.
In conclusion, the major broadcast networks have covered the release of sealed Epstein documents, but coverage concerning Bill Clinton’s ties has been inconsistent. Despite claims and allegations, the networks have chosen to downplay or omit mentioning Clinton’s involvement. As the story unfolds, it raises questions about the networks’ approach to reporting on such sensitive and significant matters. The public deserves a comprehensive and balanced examination of all the facts and individuals involved in the Epstein scandal.
