The U.S. and U.K. launched coordinated strikes on the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen on Thursday evening, targeting sites that have been causing disruptions to international shipping routes in the Red Sea. This military action has garnered bipartisan support from members of Congress, although some concerns have been raised over President Joe Biden’s use of executive action without congressional oversight.
President Biden issued a statement from the White House, warning that he would not hesitate to take further measures to protect American citizens and ensure the free flow of international commerce. While senators and representatives on both sides of the aisle have praised the administration’s decision to target the Houthi militia, a few members of Congress have expressed their worries about the lack of congressional authorization.
One member of Congress welcomed the military operations, highlighting the need to act against the Iranian proxies responsible for disrupting international commerce and attacking American vessels. They considered President Biden’s use of military force as long overdue. They added that it is crucial for Iranian leaders to believe that there will be consequences unless they abandon their campaign of terror.
Another member expressed concern over the constitutionality of the strikes. They criticized President Biden for not seeking authorization from Congress as required by the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of listening to Gulf allies, pursuing de-escalation, and avoiding further conflict in the Middle East.
Some members of Congress commended the administration for taking action against the Houthi militants but urged close consultation with Saudi partners and the formulation of a comprehensive strategy. They emphasized the severe impact the Houthi attacks have had on global shipping, the military, and the global economy.
Others highlighted the need for a decisive response to the Houthi aggression. They stated that addressing their disruptive behavior, fueled by Iran, is necessary to restore deterrence and peace in the region. They acknowledged the bravery of the military personnel involved in the strikes and expressed their support for President Biden’s actions.
One member supported the targeted strikes but recommended the continuation of diplomatic efforts to prevent broader regional conflict. They underscored the importance of engaging Congress and following legal requirements while taking military action.
The need to deter attacks on U.S. troops and restore the freedom of navigation essential for global trade was emphasized by another member. They highlighted the repeated attacks on U.S. military personnel and ships by Houthi terrorists, backed by Iran. The member called these strikes a necessary response to ensure the safety of American personnel and the resumption of uninterrupted international commerce.
However, some members of Congress raised concerns over the lack of Congressional authorization for these airstrikes. They stressed the importance of adhering to the Constitution and urged the administration to seek Congressional approval before conducting further military operations in Yemen.
In summary, the U.S. and U.K.’s military strikes on the Houthi rebels in Yemen have received bipartisan support in Congress, although concerns about executive action without congressional oversight have been raised. Members of Congress have praised the decision to combat the Houthi militia, while also underlining the importance of congressional involvement, diplomatic efforts, and adherence to constitutional requirements.
