Meghalaya Chief Minister Conrad K. Sangma has expressed his opposition to the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India, stating that it goes against the actual idea and spirit of the country. Sangma, who is the President of the National People’s Party (NPP), argued that the diverse cultures, traditions, lifestyles, and religions in India are its strength and should be preserved. He emphasized that Meghalaya, as a matrilineal society, has its own unique culture that should not be interfered with. The NPP, which is an ally of the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and the North East Democratic Alliance (NEDA), is the leading party in the ruling Meghalaya Democratic Alliance (MDA).
The debate surrounding the implementation of a UCC has resurfaced after Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently advocated for its adoption. The UCC is a proposal to formulate and implement personal laws that apply to all citizens, regardless of their religious affiliations. Currently, personal laws in India differ among various communities and are governed by their respective religious scriptures. The Parliamentary standing committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law, and Justice, led by BJP Rajya Sabha MP Sushil Modi, has announced that it will gather the views of all stakeholders regarding the UCC.
Sangma’s opposition to the UCC reflects the sentiment that many political parties and communities in the northeastern region of India share. The region, comprising states like Meghalaya, Manipur, Nagaland, and Arunachal Pradesh, has its distinct culture and traditions that its people are keen to protect. Sangma stated that the NPP understands and respects the unique culture of the northeastern region and does not want their traditions to be tampered with.
Although the UCC aims to promote equality and unity among citizens, the proposed implementation faces opposition from those who believe that personal laws should be protected in order to preserve the diversity and uniqueness of India. The Law Commission of India has sought the opinions of the public and recognized religious organizations on the matter.
It remains to be seen how the debate on the UCC will progress and whether the concerns of various communities and political parties, such as the NPP, will be taken into consideration. While proponents argue that a UCC will promote equality and harmony, opponents emphasize the importance of protecting religious and cultural diversity. As the discussion continues, a balanced approach that takes into account the interests of all stakeholders may be necessary to find a way forward.
