Uday Pratap Singh, a prominent figure in the Shringar Gauri-Gyanvapi case, is set to visit Varanasi soon, leading to speculation about his role in the ongoing legal battle. Vishwa Vedic Sanatan Sangh (VVSS) president Santosh Singh announced that Uday Pratap will attend a press conference and also visit the district court on the next hearing date, July 7th. This development comes after Rakhi Singh, the main plaintiff in the case, wrote to President Droupadi Murmu, seeking permission for euthanasia due to false propaganda against her.
Rakhi Singh, along with four other women from Varanasi, filed the Shringar Gauri case in August 2021, with the intention of obtaining permission for daily worship at Maa Shringar Sthal in the Gyanvapi complex. The plaintiffs are hoping for a favorable judgment in the case.
Santosh Singh added that Uday Pratap will be honored by the VVSS office bearers during a program in Varanasi, which will also be attended by Jitendra Singh Visen, the VVSS international president, and Rakhi Singh’s uncle. Visen has been representing Rakhi Singh in the case so far.
In a previous visit on June 8th, Uday Pratap met with Rakhi Singh at Visen’s residence in New Delhi. During that meeting, Uday Pratap assured Rakhi Singh that he would handle the case moving forward.
As this development unfolds, supporters and followers of the case are eagerly awaiting Uday Pratap’s involvement and the impact it may have on the outcome. The Shringar Gauri-Gyanvapi case has been a contentious issue, drawing attention and sparking debates regarding religious sentiments and property rights.
It is important to approach this matter with journalistic integrity, presenting a balanced view of the topic. Various perspectives and opinions surrounding the case should be considered to provide a comprehensive understanding of the situation.
In conclusion, Uday Pratap Singh’s visit to Varanasi and his involvement in the Shringar Gauri-Gyanvapi case have generated anticipation among the public. With the next hearing date approaching, all eyes are on the outcome and the potential implications it may have. Supporters and opponents of the case are eager for clarity and resolution in this ongoing legal battle.
