The head of Nancy Pelosi’s security detail, Special Agent David Lazarus, is facing allegations of perjury regarding his testimony about the events of January 6th, according to a bombshell report by The Blaze. The report, based on newly released Capitol CCTV footage, contradicts Lazarus’ claims and raises further doubts about the Democrats’ narrative surrounding the Capitol breach.
During the trial of the Oath Keepers, a group present at the Capitol on January 6th, Lazarus provided testimony that supported the claims of Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn. Dunn had stated that he had an antagonistic encounter with the Oath Keepers during the incursion. However, the footage released by The Blaze tells a different story.
The video shows the Oath Keepers calmly standing between Dunn and other protesters, in line with Dunn’s initial FBI interview. Lazarus, who claimed to have witnessed the alleged altercation, was actually in a different Senate office building at the time. He arrived several minutes after the incident had already taken place.
The Blaze’s report suggests that Dunn and Lazarus fabricated their testimonies, leading to innocent people being imprisoned. If proven guilty of perjury, they could face up to five years in prison. The release of this CCTV footage raises questions about who orchestrated this false story and why the security footage was not released earlier, potentially impacting the sentencing of those involved.
The revelation of this footage undermines the credibility of the federal government and raises concerns about what else may be hidden regarding the events of January 6th. The discrepancies in the Jan. 6 narrative have raised doubts about the accuracy of the media’s portrayal of the Capitol breach. The Blaze’s report adds to the growing skepticism surrounding the established narrative.
In light of these recent developments, critical questions remain unanswered. The implications of perjury in such a significant case are serious, as exemplified by former President Bill Clinton’s impeachment for perjury over a less severe matter. The truth surrounding Jan. 6th must be thoroughly examined, and accountability for false testimonies and misinformation must be pursued.
Overall, the released footage challenges the official narrative surrounding the events of January 6th, further eroding trust in the federal government. The implications of these allegations of perjury and the withholding of evidence are significant, suggesting a deeper complexity to the events that unfolded at the Capitol.
