Texas AG Ken Paxton Reveals Dems Rigged 2020 Elections By Ceasing To Count Votes, Then Running Mail-in Ballots Until They Achieved Fake Vote Targets (Video)
In a recent interview, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton made shocking revelations about the 2020 elections, claiming that the Democrats rigged the outcome by simply stopping the vote counting process. Paxton explained that Democrats halted the counting in key battleground states to determine how many mail-in ballots they needed to secure victory.
Speaking to former Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson, Paxton argued that former president Donald Trump was leading in these states when the vote counting abruptly ceased. He emphasized that anyone could fill out mail-in ballots without proper verification, highlighting the vulnerability of the process. Paxton, who claims to have firsthand knowledge of the scheme, asserted that this was not a conspiracy theory but a carefully planned strategy.
While some skeptics questioned the evidence behind Paxton’s claims, internet personality Collin Rugg defended the Texas AG, pointing to statistical anomalies to support the possibility of widespread fraud. Rugg cited Trump’s overwhelming success in bellwether counties and his losses in toss-up states where the counting extended for days after the election.
The interview aired on Trending Politics, a platform founded by Rugg, after the former Fox News host Tucker Carlson left the network. This departure allowed Carlson to conduct such interviews without potential backlash. Revolver News also highlighted the significance of independent platforms in shedding light on controversial issues that mainstream media might often avoid.
Interestingly, Paxton’s revelations regarding the rigged elections came at a time when he was engaged in another battle. The Supreme Court recently granted an emergency appeal by the Biden administration to remove razor wire set up by Texas at the southern border. Paxton, expressing disappointment with the decision, vowed to continue the fight in defense of Texas’s sovereignty. The Biden administration had argued that the wire hindered Border Patrol agents’ ability to carry out their duties and believed that federal immigration law overruled the state’s efforts to secure the border.
Paxton’s lawsuit against the administration, filed in October, accused it of disrupting state border control efforts and facilitating illegal entry into the country. The Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other relevant agencies were named as defendants.
These ongoing legal battles, coupled with Paxton’s claims of election rigging, highlight the precarious state of America’s electoral system and raise concerns about the potential for future manipulation. As the country contemplates the future of its democracy, citizens are left to wonder whether their voices truly matter and whether the integrity of the election process can be preserved.
In a world where technology and information flow freely, the need for transparency, accountability, and trust in the electoral process becomes more critical than ever.
