NEW DELHI – The Supreme Court has raised concerns over the issue of illegal migration and called on the government to take action to safeguard the northeastern borders and prevent influx from Bangladesh. The court highlighted the negative impact of large-scale illegal migration on the social and cultural fabric, as well as the strain it puts on national resources.
A Constitution bench consisting of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices Surya Kant, M M Sundresh, J B Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra emphasized that illegal migration is a crucial problem that requires immediate attention. The bench expressed its desire to know what steps the Union Government is taking to address this issue.
The court also announced its intention to delve into this matter while examining the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act. This act grants legality to migrants who entered the country before March 25, 1971. The solicitor general Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre and Assam, defended the validity of the section but acknowledged that post ’71, extensive migration has not only altered the state’s demography but also created numerous problems.
Illegal migration has long been a contentious issue in India, particularly in the northeastern region. It has had a profound impact on the socio-cultural dynamics of these areas. The Supreme Court’s intervention underscores the urgency of the problem and puts the onus on the government to outline the measures being taken to address it effectively.
With the court’s focus on the constitutional validity of Section 6A, the issue of illegal migration is set to receive significant attention. The section, enacted in 1985, plays a crucial role in determining the status of migrants in India. However, concerns have been raised about its effectiveness in curbing the growth of illegal migration and protecting the rights of indigenous people.
The court’s emphasis on the government’s actions to safeguard borders and stem the influx from Bangladesh indicates the need for a comprehensive and robust approach. It calls for a strategy that not only addresses the immediate concerns but also tackles the root causes of illegal migration.
The impact of large-scale illegal migration goes beyond mere demographic changes. It puts pressure on existing resources, including schools, hospitals, and infrastructure. The strain on resources can hinder the progress and development of the regions affected by illegal migration.
As the Supreme Court demands accountability from the government, it is essential to strike a balance between humanitarian concerns and the need to safeguard national security. While providing necessary relief to those who entered the country before the designated cutoff date, it is crucial to ensure that loopholes are not exploited, leading to unchecked and unregulated migration.
The government must come up with long-term solutions that address the complexities of illegal migration. This includes strengthening border security, improving surveillance mechanisms, and collaborating with international partners to address the root causes of the problem.
The Supreme Court’s intervention serves as a reminder that the issue of illegal migration cannot be ignored. It requires a comprehensive response that prioritizes the welfare of both the existing population and those seeking refuge. The responsibility lies not only with the government but also with society as a whole to ensure a fair and just resolution to this crucial problem.
The court’s vigilance in addressing the issue of illegal migration is a testament to its commitment to uphold the rule of law and protect the interests of the nation. It is now up to the government to demonstrate its dedication to tackling this issue effectively and safeguarding the northeastern borders from further infiltration. Only through collective efforts can a sustainable solution be achieved, ensuring the social, cultural, and economic well-being of the affected regions and the nation as a whole.
