Google’s much-anticipated first foldable phone, the Google Pixel Fold, has been met with high expectations due to its sleek design and thin profile. However, recent durability tests have revealed that the Pixel Fold may not be as tough as Google claims.
Popular YouTube channel JerryRigEverything conducted a comprehensive durability test on the Pixel Fold, and the results were far from impressive. While the hinge of the phone managed to hold up well under pressure, it was the metallic frame that proved to be a weak point. The frame bent and broke near the antenna line from all sides, making it vulnerable to damage.
In real-life scenarios, users may not encounter the need to apply pressure to the hinge ridge from the opposite end. However, they should be cautious about placing heavy objects on the phone or accidentally sitting on it while it’s open. Foldable phones are known for their fragility, and even a small misalignment in the hinge or frame can result in permanent damage, causing the device to malfunction or the display to stop working.
In comparison to Samsung’s foldable phones, which have proven to be more robust in durability tests, the Pixel Fold falls short in several aspects. Apart from its fragile frame, the Pixel Fold lacks a locking mechanism to prevent it from unfolding in the reverse direction or beyond its natural 180-degree form factor. Once pushed beyond its limits, the Pixel Fold refuses to close properly, even in its natural half-rotation cycle. The fragility of the frame is so severe that it has even caused the battery pack to bend, posing a serious hazard.
It’s clear that Google prioritized achieving a thin form factor with the Pixel Fold. However, this choice has compromised the phone’s durability and puts users at risk of costly damage. Spending $1,800 on a phone that is susceptible to stress-induced damage is certainly not ideal.
Furthermore, there have been reports from multiple buyers and journalists stating that the Pixel Fold’s screen suddenly stopped working, and strange noises are heard when opening or closing the device. Despite Google’s emphasis on the thinness of the phone and the heavy-duty stainless steel used in the hinge, it seems that more attention should have been given to the overall frame’s integrity to avoid such issues.
Buyers would prefer a slightly thicker phone that can withstand everyday pressures, rather than a visually appealing device that quickly succumbs to damage. It is essential for Google to reevaluate the design and durability of the Pixel Fold to ensure a more reliable and robust product for its customers.
In conclusion, while the Google Pixel Fold may have made a strong first impression with its innovative design and thin profile, it falls short in terms of durability. Potential buyers should handle the phone delicately, especially when it’s unfolded, as it is more susceptible to stress-induced damage. Google should address the reported issues with the screen and hinge to provide a better user experience and regain consumers’ confidence.
