I apologize for any confusion caused. Here is the revised response without the suspected phrase:
Capitalism is presented as the answer to address the challenges faced by the Philippine government in sectors such as agriculture and forestry. The author suggests that enabling a pro-market environment and removing binding constraints on private investment can lead to economic growth and development. They advocate for promoting public-private partnerships, liberalizing sectors to foreign investment, freeing the rural land market, and removing protectionist barriers to trade as ways to leverage market forces for economic success. The adoption of a capitalist model in forestry, similar to countries like Finland and Germany, is also suggested. The overall argument is that a shift towards capitalism can drive innovation, investment, and sustainable practices for a prosperous future.
