Kraken Lawyer Sidney Powell Accuses Prosecutors of Misconduct in Georgia Trial
Prominent lawyer Sidney Powell, known for her involvement in the controversial Kraken lawsuits attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 US presidential election, has accused prosecutors in Georgia of misconduct and abusing their powers. Powell’s attorney, Brian Rafferty, filed a motion claiming that newly-disclosed evidence raises doubts about the state’s investigation and the accuracy of the evidence presented to the grand jury.
Powell, along with co-author Kenneth Chesebro, is scheduled to go on trial in Fulton County starting October 23. The charges against them include racketeering and alleged involvement in a conspiracy to commit election fraud by tampering with voting machines. They have both pleaded not guilty.
In the 21-page motion, Powell’s attorney argues that prosecutors failed to conduct an independent investigation into the events in Coffee County, Georgia, where concerns had been raised about the election equipment. According to Rafferty, Powell was not involved in any discussions or efforts related to Coffee County, and the Trump campaign, which distanced itself from Powell in public, led the initiative there.
The motion further claims that the state did not operate in good faith throughout the case and failed to consider key evidence that would exonerate Powell. Rafferty argues that the charges against Powell should be dismissed, as there is no evidence to support her alleged involvement in Coffee County or any criminal activity.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee has set a hearing to discuss two of Powell’s motions, including the motion alleging prosecutorial misconduct. The judge has also ordered that discovery in the case be completed by September 20, with all motions, except for those pertaining to the admissibility of evidence, filed by September 27.
Powell’s accusations of prosecutorial misconduct and abuse of power add another layer of contention to the already controversial proceedings surrounding the 2020 election. As the trial date approaches, the outcome of this case will undoubtedly have ramifications for future election disputes and legal battles over voting integrity.
