In Indonesia VP debate, Gibran spars with rivals over new capital, economic plans
Indonesia’s first vice-presidential debate turned heated as Gibran Rakabuming and his rivals clashed over economic and infrastructure issues. The debate highlighted Gibran’s experience and Solo’s development while he defended his father’s new capital project. Gibran, the mayor of Solo, launched offensives questioning his rivals on their climate and economic policies using jargon to puzzle his older competitors. The debate focused on knowledge of economic, finance, trade, and infrastructure issues. Gibran emphasized his and Prabowo’s economic policies, including the new capital project and the ban on exports. Rival candidates Mahfud and Muhaimin shared their priorities, with Mahfud emphasizing corruption eradication and seven percent economic growth, while Muhaimin focused on taxing the richest and investing in young Indonesians’ skills.
As the debate progressed, tensions rose when Gibran was questioned about development priorities. He defended the new capital project, stating that only 20 percent of its development would come from the state budget, with the rest covered by private and foreign investments. Mahfud responded skeptically, highlighting the absence of foreign investments in the project. Muhaimin suggested redirecting funds to develop schools and roads in less-developed areas instead. Gibran countered by pointing out Muhaimin’s inconsistency in opposing the project after previously supporting it. However, some analysts questioned the project’s impact on reducing inequality between regions.
Gibran’s political track record as the mayor of Solo was also scrutinized, with Muhaimin asking for insights into securing Jakarta-funded infrastructure projects. Muhaimin implied nepotism and attempted to boost Gibran’s political success. Gibran defended the projects by stating that Solo was trusted due to its readiness to meet investor demands. He also turned the tables by questioning Mahfud on carbon capture and storage regulations, challenging him to provide a direct answer. Furthermore, Gibran confused Muhaimin with jargon related to lifting Indonesia’s rank in the State of the Global Islamic Economy.
The latest polling reveals Prabowo maintaining a strong lead in the presidential race, which has only grown since selecting Gibran as his running mate. The controversial decision caused accusations of abuse of power against Widodo in favor of his son’s candidacy. The upcoming presidential election on February 14 will determine Indonesia’s future leadership.
Overall, the debate showcased Gibran navigating challenging questions and defending his positions on the new capital project and economic plans. While some rivals questioned his experience and raised concerns about inequality and nepotism, Gibran stood his ground, using jargon to outmaneuver older competitors. As the election date approaches, voters will assess the performances of all candidates to decide the future direction of Southeast Asia’s largest economy.
