In a surprising turn of events, UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak is facing a significant backlash as he contemplates the cancellation of the northern section of the HS2 high-speed rail line. This decision, if made, would be announced just before the Conservative conference commences in Manchester next weekend. The potential move has sparked criticism from senior Tories and business leaders alike, who argue that such a step would be detrimental to the region’s development.
Sources reveal that Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt are scheduled to hold a meeting early this week, with Sunak expected to announce his decision around the middle of the week. It is believed that any cancellation of the HS2 section from Birmingham to Manchester would need to be made prior to the conference, as doing so amidst the event would be seen as a slight to the city.
The speculations surrounding the potential cancellation have prompted an influx of demands from business leaders urging the government to reconsider. Amidst these rumblings, rumors have also emerged suggesting that at least one minister may consider resigning if the project faces significant cutbacks.
Supporters of HS2 within the government have expressed their dismay, highlighting the detrimental impact that canceling the railway link to Manchester would have on the promised east-west rail connections, also known as Northern Powerhouse Rail. Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor of Greater Manchester, voiced his concerns over the potential consequences, emphasizing that such a decision would widen the north-south divide and undermine the government’s promises to level up the region.
Sunak’s reported distaste for the HS2 project, particularly its northern section, has long been known among those involved. While former Prime Ministers David Cameron and Boris Johnson both opposed scaling back the high-speed rail, HS2 remains one of the few prestigious infrastructure projects implemented during the Conservatives’ 13-year tenure.
Furthermore, there is increasing speculation that HS2 will not extend to Euston station in London, leading to further cost-cutting measures. London Mayor Sadiq Khan has written a letter to Sunak expressing concern over this potential outcome, arguing that existing rail connections could potentially be quicker than the proposed new line.
Within Whitehall, including the Treasury, apprehensions have grown over the potential impact of cutting back on the HS2 project. Some insiders warn that doing so would severely undermine the project’s business case and result in public perception of governmental incompetence. Additionally, they argue that the savings from scaling back the project would not provide immediate support to Sunak or generate sufficient funds for pre-election tax cuts.
Amidst a series of recent policy reversals and proposals, it is increasingly believed that Sunak’s personal preferences are influencing decision-making within the government. Concerns have been raised over the underlying basis for these policy changes, including Sunak’s aversion to HS2 and smoking, prompting questions regarding the cohesion of these policies.
As the government appears to be forging ahead with an array of radical shifts in policy, many believe that such measures are aimed at creating divisive lines with the Labour Party and establishing a clear vision for Sunak’s potential premiership. These actions are seen by some as preparation for a possible general election in May next year.
Moreover, criticism has been mounting outside Whitehall due to the government’s perceived backtracking on green commitments. Recent reports revealed the disbandment of a task force dedicated to expediting home insulation and boiler upgrades, raising questions about the government’s commitment to reducing total UK energy demand by 15% by 2030.
The proposed scrapping of the HS2 northern section is stirring controversy and concern across the political and business landscape. The ensuing discussions surrounding this contentious decision exemplify the struggles and obstacles associated with major infrastructure projects, underscoring the need for balanced and strategic planning in order to promote regional growth and connectivity.
