Housing Crisis Sparks Calls for ADU Expansion
The housing crisis for adults with developmental disabilities in Massachusetts has prompted calls for the expansion of accessory dwelling units (ADUs). An ADU is a secondary housing unit located on the same property as a primary residence, and it can provide much-needed affordable and supported housing for this vulnerable population.
According to Autism Housing Pathways, there is a growing need for affordable, supported housing for adults with developmental disabilities. The organization estimates that around 625 to 650 adults with autism alone require such housing annually, in addition to what is provided through existing programs. The proposed bill aims to address this issue by allowing individuals to access supportive services and funding streams, such as Section 8 vouchers and the Department of Developmental Services’ shared-living program, without the requirement of living in a separate legal unit.
Scott Bailey, the president of Autism Housing Pathways, supports the expansion of ADUs as one solution to the housing crisis. ADUs, often referred to as gentle density, offer incremental housing options within existing neighborhoods. This is particularly important in suburban areas where single-family, detached houses dominate the housing stock. By diversifying housing options, ADUs can accommodate a range of households, from young professionals to empty-nesters, while addressing the shortage of affordable housing.
To effectively meet the needs of adults with developmental disabilities, it is crucial that any ADU legislation allows for up to two bedrooms. This ensures that those requiring a live-in aide can be accommodated. A more broadly written ADU bill, as advocated by Bailey, would better serve the population in need.
In addition to ADUs, there are other small housing options that can contribute to solving the housing crisis in the Greater Boston area. The Metropolitan Area Planning Council’s Living Little project provides information on cottage housing, tiny houses, townhouses, and small-scale mixed-use developments, among others. By embracing a more diverse range of housing options, communities can improve access to affordable housing, promote household diversity, and work towards a more equitable and sustainable region.
In light of ongoing efforts to increase affordable housing in Boston and surrounding communities, there is an additional idea that could address multiple long-standing issues. The concept of rent-to-own for occupants of affordable housing units presents an opportunity for greater stability and a pathway to homeownership. This approach not only fosters stronger commitment to the property but also extends to the surrounding neighborhood and community. Rent-to-own programs have proven successful in improving economic prospects and narrowing the wealth gap. The City of Boston is currently exploring the implementation of such a program.
While there is a consensus on the need to promote housing near public transit to reduce reliance on cars, some aspects of the state’s MBTA Communities law require revision. For example, in Stow, a town located within a mile of the commuter rail in Acton, there is a lack of sidewalks and limited parking at the station. These issues compromise the intent of the law. It is necessary to conduct on-the-ground evaluations, considering realistic limitations, when implementing such laws. It is also important to ensure that small communities are not burdened with disproportionately high housing targets. Additionally, addressing systemic mass transit problems is crucial to encourage increased usage and incentivize housing development near public transportation.
In conclusion, the housing crisis for adults with developmental disabilities calls for the expansion of ADUs as a viable solution. ADUs, along with other small housing options, enable incremental growth and can help bridge the affordability gap in the Greater Boston area. Implementing programs like rent-to-own for affordable housing occupants and revising legislation to consider realistic limitations and improve mass transit are additional steps towards addressing the broader housing crisis in Massachusetts.
