CANYON CITY — The future of Grant County’s economic development department is now in the hands of the court following the departure of its director in September. In a unanimous decision on Wednesday, the court voted to put the department’s former office on the rental market while exploring contract opportunities for managing ongoing obligations. The department had been responsible for various projects, including securing funding for wildfire risk reduction and developing a housing strategy. The court is now evaluating whether to keep the department operational or shut it down.
Former Economic Development Director Tory Stinnett resigned in September after accepting a position as deputy director at the Greater Eastern Oregon Development Corp. Stinnett’s departure left the court facing the challenge of fulfilling ongoing obligations, managing grants, and funding from the cities. The office at the L Building in John Day, previously occupied by the Economic Development Department, is now set to be rented out, with the county expecting to generate up to $2,500 per month or $30,000 per year.
While considering the department’s future, the court recognizes the importance of exploring potential contract opportunities to ensure the continuation of essential services. The economic development department had played a crucial role in securing funds for various projects, including a $500,000 grant for wildfire risk reduction in collaboration with the Grant County Soil and Water Conservation District. Additionally, the department commissioned a housing strategy aimed at improving housing availability for local residents.
One of the noteworthy initiatives facilitated by the department was the organization of regular Community Action Team meetings. These meetings brought together government officials, business leaders, and agency representatives from Grant County to collaborate on initiatives for improving the community’s ecological, economic, and overall well-being.
As the court debates the future of the economic development department, the decision will have a significant impact on the economic growth and sustainability of Grant County. The success of past projects has demonstrated the department’s value in securing funding and coordinating efforts to address the region’s unique challenges. Stakeholders from various sectors will be eagerly awaiting the court’s final verdict and its impact on future economic development in Grant County.
The court is committed to conscientiously evaluating all options before making a final decision. City officials and community members are encouraged to provide their input during this crucial decision-making process. The court’s primary objective is to ensure the best utilization of available resources, while ultimately serving the economic interests and needs of Grant County and its residents.
In conclusion, the Grant County Court faces a significant decision regarding the future of its economic development department. With the former director now gone, the court is weighing options to fulfill ongoing obligations, manage grants, and secure funding. Stakeholders, city officials, and community members eagerly wait for the court’s ultimate decision, recognizing the importance of economic development for the region’s well-being. The court’s diligent evaluation of potential solutions demonstrates their commitment to driving sustainable growth and prosperity in Grant County for years to come.
