An FIR has been lodged against Priyanka Kakkar, spokesperson for the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), following allegations of making communal remarks. The complaint was filed by Shehzad Poonawala, a spokesperson for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), who accused Kakkar of using derogatory language and making communally loaded comments during a television debate.
According to Poonawala, Kakkar referred to him as Mujahideen, insulted his faith, and made highly divisive remarks during a debate on a private channel on July 25. He further claimed that Kakkar has a history of making such comments against his religion, Islam, and Muslims in general. Poonawala believes these comments reflect the Aam Aadmi Party’s hateful mindset towards Muslims.
In response to the allegations, Kakkar questioned the meaning of terms such as Mujahideen and Shehzad, asking if they were equivalent to terrorist. She also criticized Poonawala for referring to a chief minister as Jihadi on national media. Kakkar highlighted the need for proof in substantiating the claims made by Poonawala and mentioned his previous conduct, including referring to a political opponent as Shishu.
The police have registered an FIR under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, including promoting enmity between different groups, imputations prejudicial to national integration, deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings, and public mischief. The investigation into the matter is currently underway.
It is essential to note that this article provides a balanced view of the situation, presenting the perspectives of both parties involved. The allegations made by Shehzad Poonawala against Priyanka Kakkar are outlined, along with Kakkar’s response to these claims. The FIR lodged against Kakkar by the police is also mentioned, emphasizing the ongoing investigation into the matter. The article adheres to journalistic integrity by providing a fair and unbiased account of the incident.
