Periyar University has come under fire for banning the wearing of black clothing during a convocation ceremony, an event that included the participation of Tamil Nadu Governor R.N. Ravi. The event has sparked controversy, as it was viewed by some as a restriction of free speech. According to a circular sent out by the university’s registrar, the decision to ban black clothing was based on a directive from the Salem police. However, Salem city police commissioner, S. Vijayakumari, has denied giving any such directive.
Periyar University, which is named after Dravidian ideologue EVS Ramasamy Periyar, is known for its revolutionary approach and the shaping of Dravidian ideology, including that of the DMK. The irony of a university named after a revolutionary banning the wearing of black clothing has not gone unnoticed, especially in light of a recent controversy in neighboring Kerala.
Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan came under fire after the police issued a circular against wearing black clothing and removed a black flag that was symbolic of mourning for a person who had passed away. The police also prevented students and opposition leaders from wearing black clothing during functions attended by the Chief Minister. The fact that such restrictions have been placed on clothing by people in power has sparked concerns about the erosion of free speech and the suppression of dissenting opinions in India.
The ban on black clothing has been criticized by many on social media, who have pointed out that it is a color that holds immense significance for various communities in India. It is often worn to signify mourning but is also associated with protest movements. As such, the ban was seen as an attempt to stifle dissent and suppress free speech.
As journalists, it is important to present a balanced view of any topic. In this case, it is worth noting that there may be valid reasons for placing restrictions on clothing during certain events. However, it is also important to listen to the concerns of those who feel that such restrictions are unnecessary and may infringe upon their rights. It is hoped that events like these will prompt a larger discussion about the balance between individual rights and the need to maintain order and respect during public events.
