Charges Dropped in Live Export Ship Deaths, Sparking Calls for Trade End
In a recent development, charges against the company responsible for the deaths of 2400 sheep aboard a live export vessel have been dropped, intensifying calls for a swifter end to the trade. Leaked footage unveiled the shocking demise of animals due to heat stress while being transported to the Middle East on the Awassi Express in August 2017. Despite the outrage, Perth-based company Emanuel Exports, along with two of its directors, were charged under Animal Welfare laws, with former managing director Graham Daws and ex-director Michael Stanton pleading not guilty. However, all charges against them were abruptly discontinued in the Perth Magistrates Court on Tuesday.
The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, leading the prosecution, released a statement justifying its decision to discontinue the case. It cited various factors, including the complexity of the case, the public cost of a trial, the already incurred penalties by the company, and the changes in operating practices made by the company to avoid similar incidents in the future. Additionally, the department took into account the subsequent ban on live exports during the northern hemisphere summer.
Unsurprisingly, this outcome has left many individuals disappointed and bewildered, with questions arising about the lack of accountability for such a catastrophic incident. Federal Labor member for Fremantle, Josh Wilson, expressed his disappointment and emphasized the need for a transition away from the cruel live sheep trade, disregarding the objections put forth by numerous farmers’ groups. In line with this sentiment, activist group Alliance for Animals demanded the immediate implementation of a complete ban on live exports, as promised by the Albanese government. Policy director Jed Goodfellow highlighted that the public deserves a legitimate explanation as to why the prosecution was abandoned.
The scenes of sheep gasping for air and succumbing to the stifling heat and deplorable conditions during the journey to the Middle East deeply shocked Australians. The fact that the responsible exporter will not face any consequences is considered by many as an affront to justice. It reinforces the belief that defendants with deep pockets can avoid accountability for alleged breaches of the law.
While some argue that a ban is the only solution to prevent further animal suffering, it is crucial to acknowledge the objections raised by farmers’ groups. These groups argue that the live export trade is a significant source of income and employment for the agricultural industry. They advocate for improved regulations and stricter enforcement to ensure the welfare of the animals during transportation.
This decision to drop charges against the company responsible for the live export ship deaths has put the spotlight on the need for urgent action. It has galvanized calls for a swifter end to the trade and prompted demands for a ban on live exports as soon as possible. The public’s faith in justice has been shaken, as they grapple with the lack of accountability for a tragedy that caused immense suffering to thousands of animals. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how authorities will address this issue and whether they will prioritize animal welfare over economic interests.
