Tamil Nadu Government’s Amendment to Liquor Rules Temporarily Stalled by Madras High Court
Chennai, Tamil Nadu – In a recent development, the Tamil Nadu government’s proposal to amend liquor rules has hit a roadblock. The Madras High Court has granted an interim stay on the amendment, putting the government’s plans on hold. The decision came after Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram presented the case before the court.
The proposed amendment seeks to modify the Tamil Nadu Liquor (Licence and Permit) Rules, 1981, allowing the possession and serving of alcohol to guests during national and international events held in convention halls and stadiums. However, Advocate K Balu challenged this decision, leading to the legal battle.
During the court proceedings, Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram informed the bench, headed by Chief Justice S V Gangapurwala and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy, that the amendment had been included in the agenda for the assembly proceedings scheduled for Monday. As part of the counter affidavit, the Advocate General sought the dismissal of the case.
Upon hearing these arguments, the bench extended the interim stay on the amendment and adjourned the matter until October 30. This means that the proposed modification will remain on hold until further notice.
The Madras High Court had raised concerns during previous hearings regarding the government’s ability to amend rules without discussing them in the assembly. This underlying issue has played a significant role in the court’s decision to put a temporary halt on the amendment. The court seeks clarity on the process and the grounds on which such amendments are being made.
This recent development has sparked a debate among different stakeholders. Supporters of the amendment argue that allowing the service of liquor during events in convention halls and stadiums would be beneficial for tourism and attract more national and international gatherings. They believe it could boost the economy and create revenue opportunities.
On the other hand, opponents of the amendment express concerns regarding the social and cultural impact it may have. They worry that the availability of alcohol during public events could lead to excessive consumption and contribute to public disorder. These opposing views are expected to fuel further discussions and deliberations.
As the legal battle continues and the Madras High Court delves deeper into the matter, it remains to be seen how the proposed amendment to the liquor rules in Tamil Nadu will ultimately unfold. For now, the interim stay granted by the court represents a temporary setback for the government’s plans. The fate of the amendment will likely be determined after thorough scrutiny and examination by the judicial system.
