Title: Court Halts Woodside’s Seismic Blasting for $12 Billion Scarborough Gas Project Following Indigenous Woman’s Legal Challenge
Australia’s Federal Court has halted Woodside’s approval to conduct seismic blasting for its $12 billion Scarborough gas project due to a legal challenge by an Indigenous woman. Raelene Cooper, a traditional custodian of the Murujuga land in Western Australia, argued that Woodside failed to properly consult with her, leading to the court’s ruling to invalidate the approval.
The court’s decision marks another victory for groups opposing fossil fuel developments. However, Woodside has stated that it will not impact the project’s target to produce its first liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargo in 2026.
In her judicial review in August, Cooper highlighted that the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) made an error by approving Woodside’s seismic blasting without consulting all relevant parties, including herself. Judge Craig Colvin agreed with Cooper’s argument and determined that NOPSEMA lacked the authority to accept the environmental plan without proper consultation. As a result, the court overturned Woodside’s approval.
Cooper expressed deep concerns about the potential impact of the seismic activity on whales and turtles, both of which hold significant cultural importance for her community. She welcomed the court’s ruling, emphasizing that it is a momentous occasion for her people and their history.
Woodside, the leading independent oil and gas producer in Australia, has committed to working closely with NOPSEMA to develop an accepted environment plan before proceeding with the seismic survey. Seismic testing involves mapping fossil fuel reserves beneath the seabed by emitting compressed air from a specially adapted ship. The resulting sound waves bounce off the seabed and are detected by sensors on the ship.
Environmental authorities, such as NOPSEMA, are now reviewing the ruling to ensure that future regulatory actions align with the court’s decision. Woodside’s environmental plan will also undergo reassessment by NOPSEMA in light of the court’s decision.
The legal challenge and subsequent ruling highlight the growing resistance towards fossil fuel projects, with various groups advocating for more comprehensive environmental assessments. While Woodside remains determined to adhere to the necessary regulations, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of engaging with Indigenous communities and considering their concerns during such developments.
In summary, the Federal Court’s decision to halt Woodside’s seismic blasting for the Scarborough gas project represents a significant victory for opponents of fossil fuel developments. The ruling provides Indigenous communities with a voice and emphasizes the need for thorough consultation and environmental considerations in major projects of this nature.
