Crypto Influencer Ben Armstrong Faces Backlash and Appeals for Financial Support
Crypto influencer Ben Armstrong has recently faced criticism from American broadcaster and filmmaker Max Keiser for his promotion of shi*coins. Keiser compared Armstrong’s endorsement of these cryptocurrencies to addictive and destructive substances, highlighting the potential harm they can cause. Keiser advised Armstrong to seek help from a shi*coiners anonymous (SA) meeting and warned that continued engagement with such coins can lead to a worsened life situation.
This critical remark from Keiser comes after Armstrong made a public appeal to his followers for financial assistance in his legal battle to regain control over BitBoy Crypto. Armstrong described the ongoing situation as the most traumatic experience of his life, expressing how it has negatively impacted him and his family. He mentioned that even close friends and family members have turned against him due to financial disputes, contributing to the turmoil in his life.
In an effort to fund his legal campaign, Armstrong reached out to his supporters and requested donations to his Ethereum (ETH/USD), Bitcoin (BTC/USD), and Cardano (ADA/USD) addresses. So far, he has received over $80,000 in donations. However, this plea for financial support has provoked mixed reactions within the crypto community.
Some members of the community, like blockchain sleuth ZachXBT, have questioned Armstrong’s accountability in promoting questionable projects and meme coins that have caused losses for investors. ZachXBT highlights the need for greater responsibility and transparency in Armstrong’s endorsements.
Similarly, pseudonymous analyst Crypto Tony expressed disappointment with Armstrong’s crowdfunding appeal. He branded it as pathetic, considering Armstrong’s previous success and wealth. Crypto Tony believes that Armstrong’s decision to seek financial assistance reflects poorly on his commitment to the crypto community.
The diverse range of responses to Armstrong’s plea for support demonstrates the contrasting opinions within the crypto sphere. While some sympathize with his current challenges and are willing to contribute to his legal campaign, others question his actions and the impact of his promotions on investors.
It remains to be seen how Armstrong’s legal battle will unfold and how the crypto community will continue to react to his situation. As the controversy surrounding him persists, the conversation surrounding responsible endorsements and the potential risks associated with certain cryptocurrencies is likely to gain further attention.
Note: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publication.