Supreme Court’s Commitment to Constitutional Morality Steals the Show
In a recent summit, the Chief Justice of India (CJI) shed light on the societal acceptance of Supreme Court judgments. Emphasizing that the judiciary’s lack of elected power is not a deficiency but rather a source of strength, the CJI reiterated their commitment to constitutional morality. Contrary to popular morality, the judges focus on upholding the values enshrined in the constitution.
Justice Chandrachud, speaking on the same-sex marriage judgment, highlighted how judges often find themselves ahead of their time. He noted that his minority judgment recognized the right to form unions, but it was not accepted by the majority judgment. This exemplifies the court’s dedication to protecting societal values rooted in liberty, equality, and fraternity.
The Supreme Court’s stance on constitutional morality has been a subject of admiration. By prioritizing the principles laid out in the constitution, rather than bowing to public opinion, the Court plays a crucial role in safeguarding the fundamental rights of citizens.
Society evolves, and it is the duty of the judiciary to interpret the law in a manner that aligns with contemporary values. The Supreme Court, as the highest judicial authority, holds the responsibility of shaping societal progress through its judgments. While this often involves taking unpopular positions, it ensures the long-term preservation of core democratic principles and fundamental rights.
The recent summit sparked a discourse on the role of the judiciary and its commitment to constitutional morality. Scholars and experts weighed in, offering diverse perspectives on the subject.
Some argued that the Supreme Court’s emphasis on constitutional morality is essential to protect the rights of marginalized communities and ensure that no individual or group is subjected to discrimination. They praised the Court’s willingness to challenge societal norms and lead the nation towards a more inclusive society.
On the other hand, critics expressed concerns about the judiciary overstepping its boundaries by not aligning judgments with the popular sentiment. They argued that the Court should be more responsive to the will of the people, as public opinion reflects the pulse of society.
However, proponents of the Court’s commitment to constitutional morality maintain that judges are in a unique position to see the bigger picture. They possess the expertise to interpret the law while considering the long-term implications on society. The judiciary’s duty lies in protecting constitutional rights, even if it means going against the tide of public opinion.
Overall, the Supreme Court’s dedication to constitutional morality and its courage to be ahead of societal changes demonstrate its commitment to upholding democratic values. By staying true to the constitution and protecting the rights of all citizens, the Court plays a crucial role in shaping India’s future.
